The resource cycle
Compute → AI → Data → Compute: each member owes the next 60m CLU. These three claims total 180m CLU and cancel only when the whole cycle is considered.
RESOURCE SHARING / CLEARING / EVIDENCE
Five pilot members exchange compute, AI, data and network capacity. fed8ra offsets their mutual obligations, then NEO Chamber Book connects the remaining amount to mandates, acceptance and a signed evidence trail.
ILLUSTRATIVE PILOT · Synthetic resource claims and simulated settlement. No bank transfer or new NEO attestation.
A common accounting view reveals obligations that cancel across the federation. The resources have still been delivered in the scenario; fewer obligations need a money transfer.
Explicit demo conversion: 1 CLU = €0.50. Gross €150m − €110m offset = €40m net.
Compute → AI → Data → Compute: each member owes the next 60m CLU. These three claims total 180m CLU and cancel only when the whole cycle is considered.
Data and Network & storage owe each other 20m CLU. Their 40m CLU of gross obligations also cancel under bilateral netting.
The buyer owes four providers a combined 80m CLU. The demo conversion leaves €40m to distribute, with every provider’s net entitlement preserved.
| Debtor | Creditor | Claim |
|---|---|---|
| Resource buyer | Compute provider | 40,000,000 CLU |
| Resource buyer | AI provider | 24,000,000 CLU |
| Resource buyer | Data provider | 14,400,000 CLU |
| Resource buyer | Network & storage provider | 1,600,000 CLU |
| Compute provider | AI provider | 60,000,000 CLU |
| AI provider | Data provider | 60,000,000 CLU |
| Data provider | Compute provider | 60,000,000 CLU |
| Data provider | Network & storage provider | 20,000,000 CLU |
| Network & storage provider | Data provider | 20,000,000 CLU |
| Member | Net position | Role |
|---|---|---|
| AI provider | +24,000,000 CLU | Net recipient |
| Resource buyer | -80,000,000 CLU | Net payer |
| Data provider | +14,400,000 CLU | Net recipient |
| Compute provider | +40,000,000 CLU | Net recipient |
| Network & storage provider | +1,600,000 CLU | Net recipient |
All positions sum to zero. Positive amounts are receivables; negative amounts are payable.
The shares follow the net positions. All four recipients provide resources; this scenario includes no separate federation fee.
| Recipient | Share | Amount | Recorded outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compute providerfirm:research | 50% | €20,000,000 | Settled in simulator |
| AI providerfirm:analysis | 30% | €12,000,000 | Settled in simulator |
| Data providerfirm:report | 18% | €7,200,000 | Settled in simulator |
| Network & storage providerfirm:service | 2% | €800,000 | Settled in simulator |
A €50m pilot mandate authorises a €40m case. Five synthetic firms sign the agreement. The accepted delivery, 1GUARD decisions, allocation and simulator outcomes are bound into one immutable snapshot.
Multilateral netting, derived provider shares, a signed agreement and acceptance, mandate checks, deterministic COBOL allocation and four recorded simulator settlements. The browser can independently recompute net positions and check snapshot signatures against the site’s pinned demo keys.
Measured usage from the live federation, bank sandbox execution and a new NEO attestation for this exact case. The historical Platform Mesh record is a reference only; it does not attest these quantities. This web module makes no payment requests.
This scale scenario is separate from the existing OpenNebula month example. Its figures and historical records remain unchanged.